Jury Sides With Amazon, Says That One-Click Is Legal

A jury in Delaware Tuesday (Aug. 18) concluded that mega e-tailer Amazon didn’t infringe two online-shopping patents and found that a third had been invalid. The case involved a company called Cordance suing Amazon for patent infringement. Cordance argued that they had described the one-click method back in 1993, some four years before Amazon launched its version.

" After 14 hours of deliberations, following a 10-day trial, the federal jury of four men and four women in Wilmington, Delaware, today rejected Cordance’s claims that Amazon infringed the patents. Cordance sought more than $84 million in damages," said a Bloomberg report. "During the trial, Amazon lawyer Lynn H. Pasahow told jurors that one of the patents wasn’t infringed because Amazon uses one-click ordering, while the patent is for a system involving two clicks."

Suggested Articles

Costco changes up its menu items, and Alibaba and Guess partner for a physical store.

Janey Whiteside, Walmart's new chief customer officer, is well acquainted with the importance of customer service in modern retail.

Whole Foods will offer deals on Amazon's Prime Day, and tariffs against China are causing pricing hikes.